Random Panel: Good but not-so-noble super-hero advice

daredevil-10-194-badadvice

(From "Daredevil" number 10, 1940 something)

Character Contest 17: Mirror Universe

I had a lot of fun seeing the side-by-side heroes from last time's "Golden Age / Modern Age" theme, so I want to do something similar this week by introducing a time-honored trope of the genre: the "Mirror Universe / Evil Twin" contest!

st-mirror
(Image copyright Marvel Comics. You can tell the Kirk on the left is evil because no SANE man would wear his uniform OPEN like that! Don't tell Picard.)

Your challenge is to design two versions of the same character, one "good" and one "evil". They might be from mirror universes (like the classic Star Trek episode) or they might be twins of the one-good, one-evil variety (like every soap opera series ever written), or one might be an evil clone of the other (calling the extended Parker clone family), or whatever else you like. You can choose any genre and any sort of hero, but you have to have two versions, one good and one evil. You can either post the images separately, or put them together like I did above.

You have one week, starting today and ending next Tuesday. All entries must be left as links to an image or images in the comments to this post, and all images must be 100% HeroMachine-generated. The winner will get to choose either any item he or she wants, or their caricature, put into HeroMachine 3 for all to see and love.

Good luck everyone, I look forward to seeing what you come up with!

Caption Contest 61 Winner

With many thanks to the other entrants, the winner of Caption Contest 61 (and the right to choose either one item or a caricature of their head to be included in HeroMachine 3) is ... Loki!

contest61-winner

Sick, but funny. I am still laughing at it which is, frankly, a little disturbing in its own right.

Also funny were the Honorable Mentions for the week:

  • sabetoonth: YOU LIE!
  • Bixlord: And after getting into the van, there was neither candy nor puppies.
  • song_bird2103: Mommy wasn’t kissing Santa Clause, last night. I think we -both- know that, don’t we?
  • remy: Yeah, that’s him! That’s the man I saw naked in the phone booth!
  • TopHat: I put it to you,that you are not ’super’ and instead just ‘really great’.
  • Niall Mor: Look, Mommy! Superman’s gonna hurl!

Thanks for entering, everyone! I'll post the new contest in a bit, though I do want Loki and the others to have their moment in the sun, so it won't be TOO soon.

Random Panel: It doesn’t get much more random than this …

star-comics-5-1937-punk

(From "Star Comics" number 5, 1937.)

Poll Position: Slice and dice

Your Poll Position question this week deals with one of Marvel's most-beloved characters and the things that make him go *POP*:

{democracy:101}

Discussion after the jump.

Continue reading

HM3: On hold

Good news and bad news -- we got another paying client for a HeroMachine Mini version! Wahoo! That's good news because a) it continues to make the program valuable to UGO in a monetary sense (sales is what drives them) and b) it gives us a new toy to play with when it's done.

However, it's also bad news because it means work on HM3 will grind to a halt for the next 3-4 weeks while I crank non-stop on this very short deadline. So Polearms are going to be on hold, as will much of anything else except this new thing until further notice.

I'll still be updating the blog on the regular schedule so by all means keep checking in, making suggestions, generating hilarity, etc, but I wanted you to know the latest status, and to not be too surprised as new releases come to a halt for the next little bit.

Random Panel: More comics I don’t want to read

star-comics-5-1937-foxygrandpa

(From "Star Comics" number 5, 1937.)

Random Panel: Skyman predicts the NFL 2009 season in 1947!

skyman-3-1947-nflpredictions

Random Panel: This week in “Leather and Spandex Romance”

skyman-3-1947-sandmman

Freelance Friday: Babewatch edition

You don't have to be a filmmaker to know if you like a movie or not, and to offer a critique of it.

You don't have to be an author to know if you like a book or not, and to offer a critique of it.

And you don't have to be an illustrator to know if you like a particular drawing or not, and to offer a critique of it.

Several times on this blog, I've drawn (get it?!) some fire for coming across as too harsh on a given artist or character or series or costume. Which is fine, that's why they pay me the big bucks. But critique is a perfectly valid -- in some ways, an invaluable -- method of refining your own understanding of what you like and, more importantly, why you like it. Any art form can be appreciated (or not) at a gut level, and it's perfectly fine to live your whole life experiencing it there and no further.

But for a subject you love, like me with comics, there's so much more you can get out of it with a little time and effort. Which is why this week, I'm going to give YOU the chance to play critic.

I want you to go to Marvel's site and check out the preview pages at the bottom for Rob Liefeld's "Deadpool" issue 900. And then I want you to come back here and offer a genuine critique of the work. You don't have to be mean, or glowing in your praise, or sycophantic, or snidely hip, or anything other than honest. I want you to look at the pages of what will surely be one of the best-selling issues of the year, and I want you to think about what you do and don't like. Maybe you'll focus on the panel layouts, or the overall page design. Maybe you'll focus on the costumes or the environment, or the dialog, or the way the action flows.

Whatever it is you choose to comment on, give it some thought and give me your reaction to it. You all know my opinion of his overall "oeuvre" at this point, so there's no surprises there, but I don't want this to just be a bash-fest. The point is for you to take something that generates strong reactions in the viewer (which Deadpool 900 certainly should!) and to examine why you react to it the way you do. To articulate what it is you do and do not like.

Criticism gets a bad rap, because it's awfully easy to slip from knowledgeable commentary for the purpose of enlightening your own understanding to schoolyard heckling. But it's an important part of how we understand art, and I think it's very much worth pursuing.

I look forward to hearing your thoughts!