HM3: Brief change

The "LegwearMaleBriefs" set will be going away soon, as I've incorporated all nine items it contains into the "LegwearMaleSpandex" set, which I just updated. I also took Kaldath's suggestion and turned the most recent set of Spandex into super-hero Underoo-style briefs as well, to supplement the existing longer-legged shorts already present.

10 Responses to HM3: Brief change

  1. Avatar Captain_Kicktar says:

    That’s a lot of spandex!

  2. Avatar abominal401 says:

    Well done Jeff!Good thinking!

  3. Avatar tristan says:

    While were on the topic of changing stuff around ive thought for a while that the face sets in head should be moved into their own set.

  4. Avatar NEON_N64 says:

    I like Tristan’s idea.

    Mainly because using a head AND a face can trigger the bug that appears when using the items from the same set but a different subset.

  5. Avatar Jeff Hebert says:

    You’re confusing me. The only way to move faces out of the Head slot is to put it in some other slot and nothing else makes sense. Are you saying you want to break Face out into its own completely separate, currently non-existent, slot?

    Then what’s the point of having separate Eye, Nose, Ear, and Mouth slots?

  6. Avatar Worf says:

    @Jeff: Just an idea, and this may just apply to me, but I’d like it if you did that… took faces out of heads and into it’s own category, and then group in there all the other face parts (eye, eyebrow, nose, ear, mouth). They only have standard sections anyway….

    Again, it may just be me, but I’d feel a little more organized like that.

  7. Kaldath Kaldath says:

    I think Faces are fine where they are myself. The one thing I’d like see changed is how everything is grouped on the drop down menu. When building custom faces It is rather annoying to have the Eyes, eyebrows, nose, and mouth scattered about like they are. They don’t need to be all under a single category like other have suggested however I think they need to be located next to each other on the menu.

  8. Avatar Worf says:

    @Kaldath: You’re asking for the 2.5 organization aren’t you? I’d love that as well…

  9. Kaldath Kaldath says:

    @Worf: Something Similar anyway. Doesn’t have to be exactly like the 2.x set up, but there are certain groupings the make sense in my head anyway. Basically I think when planing out what order things are placed on the menu you need to divide the body along the lines of lower body, upper body, and head. Once you do that, you can place all the items that go on the lower body next to each other and the same for upper body and head.

  10. Avatar NEON_N64 says:

    Nahh, I guess faces are OK where they are right now.

    After reading Tristan’s post I thought it was a good idea because it would help a little to avoid the bug.

    But after thinking it a little better, I realize it wouldn’t be an actual solution to the problem, just a halfway fix for a small part of the issue. What needs to be done is to fix the bugs.