Comments on: HM3: Female update, update

By: Jigglypuff

Jigglypuff — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:29:40 +0000

Agreed. I prefer the left one; More versatile and also easier to design costumes.

By: Merrick

Merrick — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:34:59 +0000

I had previously chose not to include this as part of my first post on this topic but other peoples opinions and or comments should at least be addressed even if i do agree.

Nipples:
Jeff has already said there will not be any as far as his inclusion of items for the “standard” set, i whole heartedly agree that HM3 should not turn into “Porn-pics-made-easy” in any way shape or form.

That said i have experimented with subtle little tweaks of the program from inside out, i don’t have the eye for detail that Hammerknight and a few others have, but i can make interesting little things. my point is for any one with even a little imagination and the base understanding of scaling an object and moving said object can make a pseudo-nipple of their very own if that is what you desire.

Me personally i could really care less if the female body or even the male body had nipples cause 89% of the time when you make a character you cover up the chest [ noted in others creations along with my own].

By: Collex

Collex — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:39:12 +0000

I’m disapointed there won’t be any nipples… What if I want to Joel-Shumacherize a character? ;p

By: Jeff Hebert

Jeff Hebert — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:52:02 +0000

The plan has always been to have the exact same options (at least) for the female body set as for the male. So you’ll have the crossed arms, flying legs, etc., plus a set of (at this point) three differently-sized breasts (A cup, “default” which you’ve seen, and which look more like they’re held in by cloth or spandex or whatnot, and a “D” set). And while I was at it, I went ahead and threw in the hip-cocked legs, and the hip-cocked torso.

By: Merrick

Merrick — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:22:09 +0000

seriously? wow lol i had been thinking about that since the other night. like i said was thinking of the re-draws that would need to be done and all and asking myself “if i were in his position would it be easy to make pre-made ‘morph’ buttons or make more body parts”

By: Jeff Hebert

Jeff Hebert — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:35:20 +0000

Merrick, it’s like you were sitting right behind me watching me draw the BodyFemaleStandard set about two hours ago …

By: Merrick

Merrick — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:32:29 +0000

You know after thinking about it again and again i had an idea and a possible suggestion.

Since a lot of people like the “hip-cocked” pose and HM# will only have one body-pose for each gender i was thinking of how in the male body the standard body has multi-parts and what not, why not make the hip part of the torso its own part as well.

I understand that there may more then likely be some re-drawing involved but … its still and idea.

By: Hakoon1

Hakoon1 — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:43:22 +0000

“Kinda Sucks Hero Machines Being Made For The “Casual User”, Not The Fans.”

I’m just gonna say, if HM3 is made for the casual user, we wouldn’t be posting here. Jeff takes our ideas openly and uses them. A large portion of HM3 is probably thought up by us, the fans, the users, and the commenters in general.

By: Hammerknight

Hammerknight — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:40:07 +0000

I’m a casual user, that’s a fan. Jeff has made a wonderful program for us to use, all you have to do is put feeling into your creation, take time and nurse it into what you want. I like the challenge of the build and I’m glad that there is not a button in HM3 that says “random design” or “complete design” so all you have to do is push the button and the character is done.(That would be the lazy button if you ask me)HM3 has all the material you need to make a master piece, all you have to do is use it.

By: John

John — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:42:10 +0000

“Kinda Sucks Hero Machines Being Made For The “Casual User”, Not The Fans.”

I’m going to bet there are any number of “fans” out there who would completely and in no uncertain terms disagree with that statement.